![]() are evidently directly storing (and selling) the full, individually identifiable browsing histories of their users.Īnd the data about circumventing users is much more sensitive than the data about most ISP users. NebuAd and Phorm are at least adding a variety of pseudonymity and privacy layers to their tracking, whereas dynaweb et al. Selling the browsing histories of those users is like an ISP selling the browsing histories of its users, which is a big step beyond what companies like NebuAd and Phorm were / are trying to do. All circumvention tools work by proxying the data of their users through some third machine, so all circumventing traffic is going through that third party machine. These tools are acting as virtual ISPs for millions of users. ![]() It’s hard to state how dangerous this practice is. So they are happy to provide you with specific user data, but only if you double super promise not to share it and only if they really like you. Please contact us if you have such a need. But data that can be used to identify a specific user are considered confidential and not shared with third parties unless you pass our strict screening test. Are they available?Ī: Yes, we can generate custom reports that cover different levels of details for your purposes, based on a fee. Q: I am interested in more detailed and in-depth visit data. Aggregate data like this is a terrific resource for those of us interested in researching circumvention tool usage, and not much of a privacy risk for the circumventing users if it is only stored (as well as displayed) in the aggregate.īut the ranking site also advertises a pay service through which you can get not only much more data, but data about individual users. You can see, for example, that the three sites most visited by users of these circumvention tools are, , and. Data about aggregate usage of users of the tools is published freely. Three of the circumvention tools - DynaWeb FreeGate, GPass, and FirePhoenix - used most widely to get around China’s Great Firewall are tracking and selling the individual web browsing histories of their users. Please read my subsequent update for responses from the tool developers and further thoughts. 2023, it has no material near-term maturities.Īnchor Glass manufactures glass packaging for end markets including beer, liquor, food, beverage and ready-to-drink products.Update: The site hosting the data for these tools has now removed the faq entry offering to sell the data. The rating agency noted that Anchor's covenants are not expected to be triggered, and after extending its asset-based lending facility to Sept. Ratings projects Anchor will generate negative free operating cash flow over the next 12 months, while the leverage ratio is expected to be around 8x during that period. The combination of negative and positive impacts of the pandemic led to a 4% decline in sales in the second quarter, translating into a leverage ratio of nearly 9.5x. On the other hand, food packaging sales climbed 46% in the year to date as in-home eating took the place of dining out. Liquor-related sales in the second quarter declined by 11%. The agency said the decline of on-premises drinking because of pandemic-related shutdowns accelerated the conversion of beer bottles to aluminum cans, a move reflected in a nearly 20% decline in second-quarter 2020 sales to beer customers. In its report, Ratings detailed the company's recent operating performance. Ratings said it views the exchange of $83 million of second-lien term loans into $60 million of new first-lien loans due 2023 as tantamount to a default since lenders received less the original security's promise. It assigned the new first-lien term loan a CCC+ rating while keeping the outstanding first-lien term loans at CCC+ as well. Ratings also raised the company's second-lien term loan due 2024 to CCC-, from D. 15 by S&P Global Ratings to CCC+ and a negative outlook, from Selective Default, or SD, after concluding an exchange offer to second-lien term loan holders at a discount that steps them up in priority and switches their interest payments to partial payment-in-kind. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |